New stricter VOC regulations for car interiors are driving a shift in focus beyond the "new car smell" towards off-gassed & external pollutants, as studies show typical driver exposure to VOCs can be harmful to health.
This article examines these trends using an analysis of 21 key international scientific studies of VOC pollutants in automotive interiors, in the context of proposed new regulations from the EU and UN. It examines how:
1. New regulations are enforcing lower VOC levels in Automotive Interiors
2. The focus is moving beyond the "New Car Smell" to the toxicity of VOCs
3. Studies show VOC Levels can remain unsafe for several years
4. AqFresh™ technology eliminates VOCs from automotive interior trim
A number of countries mandate a maximum total VOC (TVOC) concentration in car interiors. In China the limit is 600 μg/m³[i], while Japan has an even stricter limit of 400 μg/m³[ii]. Some specific toxic VOCs have particularly low limits: notably Acetaldehyde and Formaldehyde, amongst others. In Europe, most car manufacturers already have their own standards similar to the VDA-278 for minimising VOCs. However, proposed new UN and EU regulations are bringing a greater focus on the most toxic of pollutants in car interiors, with the aim of improving Vehicle Interior Air Quality (VIAQ).
The European Union’s proposed new formaldehyde regulation[iii] requires cars to have <62 μg/m³ formaldehyde. A class I carcinogen, formaldehyde is commonly found in car interiors due to off-gassing from nonwovens, plastics, adhesives & coated textiles used in headliners, seat covers, carpets, door and dashboard trim.
Cars must be tested in a whole vehicle test chamber according to ISO 12219-1:2021 under 3 environmental conditions: ambient conditions (ambient mode) at 23 °C - 25 °C with no air exchange; a second only for the measurement of formaldehyde at elevated temperatures (parking mode); and a third for VOCs and carbonyl compounds simulating driving after the vehicle has been parked in the sun starting at elevated temperatures (driving mode).
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) are working on a Draft Mutual Resolution (M.R.3) on Vehicle Interior Air Quality[iv] aiming for final publication in 2025 which will harmonise the testing of car interiors for the presence of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, Ethylbenzene, Styrene, and Acrolein (from the off-gassing of automotive interior trim materials). It will also cover the testing of car interiors for the presence of PM2.5, NO, NO2, and CO2 (typically from outdoor air pollution entering the cabin). The exact limits to be enforced will be set in each country’s national standards.
The proposed new EU End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV) directive[v] requires automotive OEMs to manufacture cars with at least 25% recycled materials by 2030. However, recycled materials are typically more malodorous with VOCs absorbed during their previous use.
Whilst the "new car smell" associated with VOCs is noticeable primarily in new vehicles, the focus is now shifting towards other harmful pollutants, in particular: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), as well as Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene and Styrene. These can be present even in older cars and are linked to various health concerns, including:
However, in half of the 21 studies measuring VOCs in car interiors reviewed, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were not measured. The new EU & UN regulations are therefore driving a greater focus on these toxic pollutants.
VOC pollutants in car interiors are toxic to drivers’ health. Research indicates that VOC levels in car interiors can remain at unsafe levels for several months, and even years after manufacture. While VOCs are mostly present initially due to off-gassing from car materials, other sources like outdoor air pollution, car exhaust, and passenger activity (tobacco, food, perfume, etc) contribute to in-car VOCs over time.
Short-term exposure to VOCs >3000 μg/m³ is expected to cause discomfort and possibly headaches, as shown in Table 1 below, according to the study by Yingying Cha (2019)ii. 10 of the studies reviewed have detected TVOC levels >3000 μg/m³.
Possible health effects due to short-term exposure to TVOC concentration | |
Concentration of TVOC (µg/m³) | Possible health effects for short-term exposure |
< 200 | No irritation or discomfort feelings |
200 - 3000 | Possible irritation or discomfort feelings |
3000 - 25000 | Expected discomfort feelings, possible headache |
> 25000 | Possible neurotoxic effects |
Whilst TVOC levels are an important measure, there are some common car interior VOCs with more severe health effects than others. Formaldehyde & Benzene are class I carginogens, whereas Styrene is a class IIa probable carcinogen and Acetaldehyde & Ethylbenzene are class IIb possible carcinogens.
Although opening the window or turning the AC on will reduce VOCs to a safer level, most national VOC standards are based on testing cars in parked/unventilated mode at c. 23°C.
Wang et al, 2023[x] measuring VOCs in a new car for 12 days under different environmental conditions detected formaldehyde with an average concentration of 82.7 μg/m³ and a peak concentration of 223.5 μg/m³, way above the new EU formaldehyde limit of 62 μg/m³ and the Chinese national standard limit for in-cabin formaldehyde concentration of 100 μg/m³. Increasing air & material surface temperature generally increases VOC concentrations. In this study, in-cabin temperatures ranged from 20 to 90°C, with the dashboard being the car part that experienced the highest temperatures, so this is a key car part to address.
The health risks of formaldehyde exposure for car drivers was revealed by a study by Reddam and Volz, 2021[xi]. It showed that driving for 4 hours a day in a car with the average level detected of 24.25 μg/m³ formaldehyde (just 30% of the average level found in the Chinese study) gives the driver a 74% probability of exceeding the Reference Daily Dose (ie. ‘safe’ level of exposure to avoid cancer).
Whilst reducing the new car smell to below 3.0 on the VDA-270 and minimising TVOCs according to VDA-278 and ISO 12219 is the current norm, there remains a VOC health concern in cars. Future regulation is likely to seek to improve VIAQ for human health.
A new additive odour & VOC elimination technology, AqFresh™, has been incorporated into car materials to reduce the VOCs they off-gas. It can also be incorporated into car AC filters which play an important role in helping combat in-car pollution beyond the initial few months, to help keep car users safe.
AqFresh™ technology, from Cambridge-UK Chemtech Aqdot, offers a novel solution to address VOCs in car interiors. By incorporating AqFresh™ into car materials, such as fabrics, nonwovens, plastics, and air conditioning filters, it captures and eliminates both off-gassed VOCs from the materials themselves and external VOCs entering the car from the environment.
Benefits of AqFresh™ for Material Design Engineers and Car Manufacturers:
Looking to the future:
With growing awareness of the health risks associated with VOCs in car interiors, and stricter regulations on the horizon, AqFresh™ technology offers a valuable solution for material design engineers and car manufacturers seeking to create safer, healthier and regulatory-compliant driving experiences.
To find out more, please complete the form below.
References
[i] Tokumura, M., Hatayama, R., Tatsu, K., Naito, T., Takeda, T., Raknuzzaman, M., . . . Masunaga, S. (2016). Car indoor air pollution by volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in Japan. AIMS Environmental Science, 362-381 (https://www.aimspress.com/article/id/831).
[ii] Yingying, C. (2019). In-cabin VOCs: Sources, health effects, and control methods. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336578692_In-cabin_VOCs_Sources_health_effects_and_control_methods#pf7.
[iii] European Union (EU). (2023, July 14). Eur-Lex. Retrieved from Official Journal of the European Union: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023R1464
[iv] United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2024, February 7). Retrieved from Working Party on Pollution and Energy (GRPE): https://wiki.unece.org/download/attachments/228622570/VIAQ-29-04-Draft%20Part%20IV%20of%20the%20Mutual%20Resolution%203%20on%20VIAQ.docx?api=v2
[v] European Union (EU). (2000, September 18). Eur-Lex. Retrieved from Official Journal of the European Union: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/end-of-life-vehicles.html
[vi] Yoshida, T., & Ichiro, M. (2006). A case study on identification of air-borne organic compounds and time courses of their concentrations in the cabin of a new car for private use. Environ. Int., 58–79 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15993490/).
[vii] Hafs, N., Djeddou, M., Benabed, A., Fokoua, G., & Mehel, A. (2023). Experimental Study of the TVOC Distribution in a Car Cabin. Air 2023, 184-195 (https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4168/1/3/14).
[viii] Zhang, G.-S., Li, T., Luo, M., & Liu, J.-F. (2008). Air pollution in the microenvironment of parked new cars. Building and Environment, 315-319 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223322085_Air_pollution_in_the_microenvironment_of_parked_new_cars).
[ix] Bakhtiari, R., Hadei, M., Hopke, P. K., Shahsavani, A., Rastkari, N., Kermani, M., . . . Ghaderpoori, A. (2018). Investigation of in-cabin volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in taxis; influence of vehicle's age, model, fuel, and refueling. Environmental Pollution, 348-355 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749117346833?via%3Dihub).
[x] Wang, H., Guo, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, R., Gao, Y., Zhang, X., . . . Xiong, J. (2023). Observation, prediction, and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in a vehicle cabin environment. Cell Reports Physical Science, (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386423001431).
[xi] Reddam, A., & Volz, D. C. (2021). Inhalation of two Prop 65-listed chemicals within vehicles may be associated with increased cancer risk. Environment International, (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041202100026).